| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (92%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock Q1900-ITX (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180326 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 08 '20 at 13:48 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 92% |
PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron J1900
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
|
37.4%
Below average
|
31% 41.2 Pts
|
5% 36.4 Pts
|
2% 37.6 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0F31) 1.5GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
|
0.95%
Terrible
|
1% 1.07 fps
|
1% 1.54 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate ST3320613AS 320GB-$30
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 22 18 20 31 23 MB/s
|
10.3%
Very poor
|
14% 18.7 MB/s
|
61% 0.47 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate ST3160023AS 160GB-$24
42GB free
Firmware: 3.18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 41 MB/s
|
27.4%
Poor
|
35% 47 MB/s
|
129% 0.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905469-063.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
16.6%
Very poor
|
15% 5.23 GB/s
|
11% 3.9 GB/s
|
39% 103 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Q1900-ITX Builds (Compare 43 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock Q1900-ITX
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 8% - Terrible | Total price: $38 |