TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP ZBook 15u G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP ZBook 15u G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8079
Memory2.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190120
Uptime6.7 Days
Run DateAug 10 '20 at 12:36
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 38%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 88.9
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 123
59% 93.8 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 201
23% 180 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑
This bench: 58.6%
 Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 8079) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7757
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.94% Terrible
Lighting 6.57
Reflection 8.73
Parallax 6.59
5% 7.3 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 12.7
7% 8.03 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 5.94%
 Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$69
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW75H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 319 319 294 325 310 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 1,282
Write 622
Mixed 627
SusWrite 326
158% 714 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 42.5
139% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 632
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 354
282% 406 MB/s
Poor: 136% ↑
This bench: 134%
 Great: 262%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
981GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 342 330 286 357 356 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 396
Write 356
Mixed 326
SusWrite 332
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 34.3
115% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 285
225% 313 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑
This bench: 86.5%
 Great: 125%
Synology iSCSI Storage 1.5TB
407GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.4 8.1 8 8 8.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
3.65% Terrible
Read 3.5
Write 8.7
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 8.2
5% 6.43 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.5
256% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 3.65%
 Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.6% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 10.2
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 39.6%
 Great: 56%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ZBook 15u G3 Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 15u G3

CPU
Core i7-6500UIntelBench 46%, 102,213 samples470x
Core i7-6600UIntelBench 45%, 31,982 samples80x
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples47x
GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples597x
Firepro W4190MAMDBench 7%, 168 samples12x
Radeon R7 M350AMDBench 7%, 123 samples3x
SSD
Blue SN570 1TB SSDWDBench 242%, 1,815 samples72x
Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBWDBench 468%, 14,020 samples49x
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TBBench 286%, 17,197 samples30x
RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 40%, 36,753 samples206x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples72x
HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 1x16GBHynixBench 40%, 22,543 samples20x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback