Gigabyte B365M DS3H

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte B365M DS3H (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '20 at 17:20
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	62%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$135 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	61.9% Good	Memory 69.5 1-Core 104 2-Core 158 65% 110 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 406 44% 351 Pts	64-Core 394 24% 394 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% XFX(1682 C580) CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48% Average	Lighting 60.7 Reflection 55.9 Parallax 71.7 50% 62.8 fps	MRender 59.2 Gravity 59.3 Splatting 49.3 45% 55.9 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Biostar S100-240GB 240GB 879 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 111 119 112 68 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.4% Below average	Read 268 Write 134 Mixed 148 SusWrite 107 36% 164 MB/s	4K Read 13.4 4K Write 25.6 4K Mixed 15.4 54% 18.1 MB/s	DQ Read 63.1 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 32.4 44% 78.1 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 93%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 448GB free Firmware: MS2OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 112 116 121 113 120 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Read 159 Write 129 Mixed 50 SusWrite 117 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905701-131.A00G 1x16GB 174 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 11.7 37% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 4.9 20% 7.07 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B365M DS3H Builds (Compare 9,068 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 55%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B365M DS3H - $146

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	2,537x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	1,043x
Core i5-9600KIntel $145Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	980x

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	623x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	602x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	502x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	337x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	221x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	205x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	400x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	377x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	179x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $550

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16