Nutanix AHV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory8.03GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.03GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemNutanix AHV  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory6 GB free of 8.03223 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 11 '20 at 14:45
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6150
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 70.3
1-Core 109
2-Core 216
72% 132 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 426
57% 426 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nutanix VDISK 107GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 154 152 105 100 89 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 43% Great: 102%
Nutanix VDISK 64GB
54GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 154 154 113 90 103 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Red Hat 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
55.5% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 22.8
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AHV Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Nutanix AHV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback