Nutanix AHV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNutanix AHV  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.3 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1206 x 1119 - 32 Bit couleurs, , , 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '20 at 12:16
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6150
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Memory 46.4
1-Core 73
2-Core 138
48% 85.9 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 150
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID M10-1B4
Nvidia(10DE 1339) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 426.26
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 18.8
16% 18.7 fps
MRender 23.5
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 15.9
16% 20.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nutanix VDISK 86GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 98 92 96 65 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 130
Write 66.5
Mixed 94.5
SusWrite 84.4
70% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 2.4
400% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Red Hat 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
30.7% Below average
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 7.8
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 5.3
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AHV Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Nutanix AHV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback