Today's hottest deals

HP h8-1437c

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP h8-1437c  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory5.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120828
Uptime18.2 Days
Run DateAug 11 '20 at 22:42
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 47%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 179
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 310
40% 304 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.5% Above average
Lighting 65.6
Reflection 65.2
Parallax 81.2
54% 70.6 fps
MRender 68.1
Gravity 65.7
Splatting 54.7
51% 62.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 42 66 79 77 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 106
Write 106
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 66
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 114%
Mass Storage Device 1TB
1TB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 4.2 4.2 4.8 4.2 4.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
3.92% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 4.7
Mixed 7.5
SusWrite 4
9% 7.68 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.92%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.7% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 12.4
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 12.3
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h8-1437c Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1437c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $273WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback