Today's hottest deals

Mifcom P17SM-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMifcom P17SM-A  (all builds)
MotherboardClevo P17SM-A
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '20 at 14:15
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 211
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 536
55% 442 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 75%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo mSATA 250GB-$299
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT41B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 267 268 268 270 270 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 465
Mixed 332
SusWrite 282
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 52.4
179% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 213
200% 311 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
930GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 423 424 424 423 423 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 466
Mixed 444
SusWrite 420
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 55.3
185% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 350
266% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 119%
Great: 133%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 2TB-$147
1.5TB free
Firmware: X61110RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 412 413 413 412 412 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 390
Mixed 352
SusWrite 410
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 35.4
119% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 273
226% 324 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 96%
Great: 119%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$8
9GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 103
Write 15
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 14.5
38% 39 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
41% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM3B8G2E1600L10S 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.9% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 17.2
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 19.3
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback