Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	56.8% Above average	Memory 78.7 1-Core 52.1 2-Core 105 50% 78.7 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 206 27% 205 Pts	64-Core 210 13% 210 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 70%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 128GB SSD 128GB 8,135 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 242 242 241 240 239 MB/s Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61.7% Good	Read 256 Write 234 Mixed 220 SusWrite 240 54% 237 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 48 4K Mixed 21.6 97% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 22.5 59% 125 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 99%
Hitachi HCS725032VLA380 320GB 143 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 282GB free Firmware: V54OA7HA SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 67 66 67 66 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 68.2 Write 65.7 Mixed 41.9 SusWrite 66.1 44% 60.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
MARKVISION Kingston 99U5474-016.A00LF 6GB 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 12 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 10.7 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 82.9 48% 82.9 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	121x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	36x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	32x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	19x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	10x
99U5403-159.A01LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 987 samples	10x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16