Intel X99

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel X99  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '20 at 21:34
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 62.8
2-Core 126
55% 89.8 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 423
40% 333 Pts
64-Core 645
40% 645 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600
Nvidia(10DE 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 4.08
Parallax 4.47
3% 4.25 fps
MRender 5.19
Gravity 4.93
Splatting 6.96
5% 5.69 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA722010ZLA330 1TB
662GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JKAOA3GF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 51 50 53 68 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 41.2
Write 22.2
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 54.9
28% 38.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 71%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
82GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 113 114 114 113 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 112
Write 109
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 114
72% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
194% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
466GB free
Firmware: HP63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 121 121 122 122 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 116
Write 112
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 122
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 70%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
3GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 162
Write 68.4
Mixed 70.7
110% 100 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.5
153% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9905702-010.A00G 9905702-121.A00G 9905702-010.A00G 9905702-119.A00G 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 35.8
MC Mixed 32.8
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 14.2
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Builds (Compare 2,277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback