Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu LIFEBOOK S752

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK S752  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB23F
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180308
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 18 '20 at 18:09
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 82.1
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 146
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 214
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 16C1) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.95% Terrible
Lighting 4.33
Reflection 5.73
Parallax 3.41
4% 4.49 fps
MRender 5.62
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.35
5% 5.48 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.95%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$35
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 11 50 3.3 130 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
30% Below average
Read 467
Write 410
Mixed 7.3
SusWrite 102
54% 247 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.3
19% 5.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 30%
Great: 92%
Ithoo Tech 512GB
357GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.4% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 24.2
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 13.4
18% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 6.6
1,115% 6.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 20%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$32
110GB free
Firmware: AX001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 105 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 70.2
Write 70.5
Mixed 29
SusWrite 105
50% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 62%
Generic USB3.0 Device 2TB
208GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 22.3
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 12.3
27% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 55%
Innostor Innostor 32GB
25GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 11 11 11 11 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
8.04% Terrible
Read 30.3
Write 20.3
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 11
27% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
25% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.04%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-063.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
56.3% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 18.4
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.8
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK S752 Builds (Compare 133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK S752

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback