Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	45.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 970M Pro3 (all builds)
Memory	8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160617
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 22 '20 at 06:51
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	63.8% Good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 70.8 2-Core 137 59% 96.8 Pts	4-Core 244 8-Core 429 41% 337 Pts	64-Core 419 26% 419 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Gigabyte(1458 2304) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.5.1 Performing below potential (56^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.1% Average	Lighting 55 Reflection 62.2 Parallax 71.3 45% 62.8 fps	MRender 63.2 Gravity 54.4 Splatting 51.9 46% 56.5 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT500MX500SSD1N 500GB 202 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 384GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 395 398 388 397 362 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Read 455 Write 382 Mixed 384 SusWrite 379 90% 400 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 50.1 4K Mixed 39.2 122% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 173 142% 203 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 127%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 861GB free Firmware: AX003J SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 92 91 94 90 95 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	37.1% Below average	Read 36.3 Write 89.1 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 92.9 44% 60.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 82% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SLA302G08-GGNHC Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.5% Below average	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 9.4 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 8.3 24% 8.3 GB/s	Latency 76.1 52% 76.1 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	289x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	228x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	70x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	92x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	51x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	47x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GBUnknownBench 52%, 6,864 samples	35x
NMUD380D81-1600C 1x8GBUnknownBench 28%, 485 samples	26x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $217

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16