QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics86.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory23.4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 23.4GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory15.8 GB free of 23.4375 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 22 '20 at 12:57
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC (with IBPB)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 65
1-Core 115
2-Core 215
72% 132 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 788
73% 609 Pts
64-Core 1,033
64% 1,033 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.4% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 120
Parallax 101
88% 110 fps
MRender 97.3
Gravity 116
Splatting 91.4
82% 102 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 354GB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 576 375 444 385 383 379 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB
923GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 107
Write 110
Mixed 52
SusWrite 0
50% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
158% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 111%
Red Hat VirtIO 2TB
725GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 76 85 88 62 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
46% Average
Read 86.5
Write 89.2
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 73.6
62% 83 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46%
Great: 110%
USB Flash Disk 8GB
5GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 0.1 5.6 6.3 12 14 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
7.31% Terrible
Read 20
Write 23.8
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 6.8
24% 17.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.3
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.31%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 23GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 7616 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.1% Good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 25
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 20.5
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback