QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory9.5 GB free of 12.0469 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '21 at 19:47
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC-Rome
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 7 cores, 14 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 67.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 226
74% 137 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 768
75% 616 Pts
64-Core 1,178
73% 1,178 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 77%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 159
Reflection 157
Parallax 158
130% 158 fps
MRender 166
Gravity 142
Splatting 121
114% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 120%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 268GB
223GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 345 342 353 330 342 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 81%
Red Hat VirtIO 250GB
84GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 295 284 285 281 295 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 405
Write 298
Mixed 313
SusWrite 290
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 30
99% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 310
240% 327 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 99%
Red Hat VirtIO 160GB
51GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 81 82 83 83 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.38% Terrible
Read 88.9
Write 84.7
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 81.8
17% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
3% 1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.38%
Great: 32%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB
338GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 69 68 71 69 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 59.6
Write 52.6
Mixed 24
SusWrite 68.7
37% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 111%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB
738GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 172 173 173 173 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 151
Mixed 113
SusWrite 172
110% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x12GB
1 of 1 slots used
12GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 44.8
MC Write 42
MC Mixed 35.3
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 37.7
SC Mixed 29.1
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 108%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 45: 6R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
45% 33% 45 298 225 144 27" 2560 1440 AOC2702 Q27G2G4
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 607 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback