Today's hottest deals

Asus H170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '20 at 15:02
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$100
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 132
2-Core 260
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 712
75% 602 Pts
64-Core 709
44% 709 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.8% Below average
Lighting 42.4
Reflection 41.8
Parallax 37.4
35% 40.6 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 33.4
30% 36.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000H1 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 282 288 289 289 290 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 290
Mixed 247
SusWrite 284
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 37.3
163% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 210
190% 291 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 102%
Thnsn5128gpu7 TOSHIBA 128GB
117GB free
Firmware: 57MB4102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 579 579 572 573 585 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,113
Write 572
Mixed 578
SusWrite 562
157% 706 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 54
213% 83.7 MB/s
DQ Read 705
DQ Write 537
DQ Mixed 541
426% 594 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 171%
Great: 176%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 126GB
117GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 401 419 412 412 411 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 413
Mixed 286
SusWrite 398
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 39.9
154% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 151
165% 278 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 11.1
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS - $296

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $671
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback