Today's hottest deals

Intel X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics41.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardIntel X58  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32.0039 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '20 at 22:14
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5687
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 91.5
2-Core 184
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 450
46% 371 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
41.2% Average
Lighting 52.6
Reflection 53.4
Parallax 68.7
43% 58.2 fps
MRender 53.6
Gravity 50.2
Splatting 38.3
38% 47.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,924
Write 3,105
Mixed 3,354
770% 3,461 MB/s
4K Read 260
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 138
631% 170 MB/s
DQ Read 621
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 411
326% 462 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
583 240GB
42GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
13.3% Very poor
Read 30
Write 26.6
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 26.2
6% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 9.8
32% 9.83 MB/s
DQ Read 10.9
DQ Write 13.9
DQ Mixed 12.4
9% 12.4 MB/s
Seagate Expansion 1TB
1GB free
Firmware: 0502
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 31.6
Write 28.8
Mixed 28.1
22% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 66%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$38
223GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 78 86 89 83 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 98.4
Write 98.7
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 84.9
62% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 62%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7
7GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 4.8 5.3 4.9 4.2 4.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
6.63% Terrible
Read 29.2
Write 3.7
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.8
10% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.63%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2K70CM0-YF8 Hynix HMT42GR7BMR4C-G7 Winbond W25X/Q32 68GB
1066, 1066, 33 MHz
16384, 16384, 36864 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
37.6% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 11.3
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.8
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 74.8
53% 74.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 254 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback