Today's hottest deals

Intel X58

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardIntel X58  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32.0039 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '20 at 13:27
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5660
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 71.3
1-Core 52.7
2-Core 102
47% 75.4 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 262
28% 223 Pts
64-Core 365
23% 365 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,289
Write 2,298
Mixed 2,382
520% 2,323 MB/s
4K Read 167
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 90.7
424% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 501
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 377
289% 397 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB
28GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 132
Write 144
Mixed 110
29% 128 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 32.6
84% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 220
151% 185 MB/s
Poor: 95% Great: 223%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$38
93GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 104
Write 101
Mixed 55.7
64% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
28GB free
Firmware: 0502
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 30.8
Write 26.5
Mixed 26
21% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 66%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7
3GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 22
Write 5.2
Mixed 5.2
10% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 22%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
25GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 21.7
Write 4.2
Mixed 7.7
11% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
44% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2K70CM0-YF8 Hynix HMT42GR7BMR4C-G7 Winbond W25X/Q32 68GB
1066, 1066, 33 MHz
16384, 16384, 36864 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
28.8% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.5
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 98.4
41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 254 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback