Today's hottest deals

Samsung 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP350XAA-KF3BR
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181016
Uptime6.4 Days
Run DateAug 31 '20 at 22:32
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7020U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
42.8% Average
Memory 54.7
1-Core 55.1
2-Core 97.8
42% 69.2 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 185
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Sanyo(144D C804) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7987
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.04% Terrible
Lighting 5.37
Reflection 7.92
Parallax 5.66
4% 6.32 fps
MRender 5.19
Gravity 5.07
Splatting 11.3
6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.04%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
801GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU001F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 104 96 103 106 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 136
Write 142
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 106
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.5
192% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 79%
USB DISK 2.0 4GB
1GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 2.6 3.5 3 3.3 3.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 0.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 3.2
6% 5.53 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SMS4TDC3C0K0446SCG 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.8% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 6.6
22% 7.83 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 5.9
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA Builds (Compare 700 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback