MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 102% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	96.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B79
Motherboard	MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) (all builds)
Memory	52.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191111
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 05 '20 at 15:08
Run Duration	517 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	43%

Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$515 50,170 User benchmarks, average bench 89% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	73.9% Very good	Memory 64.9 1-Core 108 2-Core 221 71% 131 Pts	4-Core 443 8-Core 880 78% 661 Pts	64-Core 2807 174% 2807 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$199 254,908 User benchmarks, average bench 98% XFX(1682 5701) Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.2 Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	96.7% Outstanding	Lighting 105 Reflection 108 Parallax 206 86% 140 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 143 Splatting 163 118% 141 fps
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-ASM2NE2512GTTDR 512GB 5,250 User benchmarks, average bench 211% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 257 244 232 225 235 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	124% Outstanding	Read 617 Write 972 Mixed 470 SusWrite 257 130% 579 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 75.8 4K Mixed 48.6 149% 51.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1027 DQ Write 634 DQ Mixed 415 421% 692 MB/s
Poor: 129% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 290%
WDC WD60 EMAZ-11LW3B0 6TB 2GB free Firmware: 80.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 168 Write 134 Mixed 80.5 28% 128 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 9.3 4K Mixed 0.7 36% 10 MB/s	DQ Read 1.2 DQ Write 14.2 DQ Mixed 0.4 2% 5.27 MB/s

Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87 14,331 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 243GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 110 115 115 113 111 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	Read 65.2 Write 114 Mixed 52.9 SusWrite 112 63% 86 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.5 168% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 87%
Seagate ST3000VM002-1F316N 3TB 881 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 36GB free Firmware: SC11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 84 84 83 81 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	44.4% Average	Read 71.2 Write 62.5 Mixed 37 SusWrite 83.3 46% 63.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 100%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB 3,748 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 3TB free Firmware: SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 41 39 40 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Read 34.9 Write 40 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 40.7 26% 35.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.2 42% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 105%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 96GB free Firmware: MX6O SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 128 129 130 132 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Read 88.3 Write 105 Mixed 10.5 SusWrite 126 59% 82.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 107%
Hitachi HDS723030BLE640 3TB 852 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 149GB free Firmware: MX6O SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 88 85 81 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Read 102 Write 105 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 84 57% 78.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 118% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 104%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 37GB free Firmware: MX6O SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 97 97 94 95 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Read 110 Write 102 Mixed 28.4 SusWrite 95.3 61% 83.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 3GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 15 14 12 12 11 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 3GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 1.1 9.8 11 12 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2GB free Firmware: MX6O SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 13 12 12 12 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 181 180 179 176 181 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 135 Mixed 70.3 SusWrite 178 101% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 114%
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$41 64,201 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2GB free Firmware: HPDA Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 82 Write 86.2 Mixed 60.2 57% 76.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 1.6 324% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 65%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 738GB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 87 86 82 86 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Read 96.1 Write 91.6 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 83.9 59% 80.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1GB free Firmware: CC45 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 147 Write 110 Mixed 73.2 82% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Seagate ST32000644NS 2TB 7,161 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 125GB free Firmware: SN11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 93 92 92 92 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	52.7% Above average	Read 93.6 Write 100 Mixed 48.4 SusWrite 90.2 61% 83.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 108% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 74%
Seagate ST6000DM0003 6TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 0GB free Firmware: DNA2 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 125 Write 97.5 Mixed 47.6 66% 89.9 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1.1 752% 6 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 93%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1GB free Firmware: MX4O Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 55.2 Write 83.4 Mixed 43.7 45% 60.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 335GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 94 93 92 92 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Read 81.9 Write 79.6 Mixed 54.7 SusWrite 90.3 56% 76.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 84%
Apple HD D ST1000DM003 1TB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2GB free Firmware: AP18 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 63.3 Write 42.6 Mixed 58.2 41% 54.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 111%
WD WD15EVDS-73V9B1 1.5TB 2,082 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 2GB free Firmware: 01.0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 37.1 Write 34.5 Mixed 28.1 25% 33.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 118% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 54%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114 34,353 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 112 160 153 175 164 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	Read 138 Write 107 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 152 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 105%
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$41 64,201 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1GB free Firmware: HPDA Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 105 Write 108 Mixed 50 64% 87.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 1.5 317% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 65%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 3GB free Firmware: AX1P SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 54 53 53 53 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Read 72.7 Write 53.7 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 53.3 38% 52 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 103% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 62%
Intenso External USB 3.0 1TB 614 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1GB free, PID 0701 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 1.1 1.1 2.2 2.2 2.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 46.7 Write 10.7 Mixed 17.4 SusWrite 1.7 20% 19.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 4x16GB 2,054 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	89.1% Excellent	MC Read 38.3 MC Write 32.2 MC Mixed 34.7 100% 35.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 18.9 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 140%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 1,481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) - $112

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	430x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	208x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	185x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	99x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	76x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	73x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	66x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	61x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	56x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	83x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	75x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	64x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $608

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) - $112

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)