Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3550 7,649 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	55.8% Above average	Memory 78.9 1-Core 72.2 2-Core 138 58% 96.4 Pts	4-Core 203 8-Core 132 24% 168 Pts	64-Core 148 9% 148 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000 15,855 User benchmarks, average bench 6% HP(103C 084A) 1GB CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.84 Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	4.6% Terrible	Lighting 4.5 Reflection 5.85 Parallax 5.56 4% 5.3 fps	MRender 8.81 Gravity 7.17 Splatting 7.61 6% 7.86 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 4.6% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 116 83 89 82 73 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	50.3% Above average	Read 208 Write 201 Mixed 188 SusWrite 103 39% 175 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 37.7 4K Mixed 26.8 87% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 191 144% 193 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 124%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB 14,997 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 442GB free Firmware: JP2OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 85 85 81 81 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	52% Above average	Read 100 Write 90 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 81.2 59% 80.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 76%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 9.9 9.5 8.9 9 7.7 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	4.54% Terrible	Read 16 Write 4 Mixed 6 SusWrite 8.9 10% 8.73 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.54% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4G1 ID:01 98 9965432-013.A00LF ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4G1 ID:01 98 9965432-027.A00LF ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4G1 ID:01 98 9965432-027.A00LF 46GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.1% Below average	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 13.3 30% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 9 21% 7.27 GB/s	Latency 82.6 48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 42GBUnknownBench 37%, 128 samples	22x
ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 46GBUnknownBench 45%, 108 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 46GBUnknownBench 46%, 280 samples	16x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16