Asus V-P8H67E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Asus V-P8H67E (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK V-P8H67E
Memory	11.3 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20120216
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 13 '20 at 13:49
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$191 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 94.2 2-Core 186 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 306 8-Core 461 48% 384 Pts	64-Core 467 29% 467 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 378E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.4% Poor	Lighting 33.3 Reflection 27.6 Parallax 34.3 27% 31.7 fps	MRender 34.1 Gravity 35.8 Splatting 32.8 28% 34.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: 17.01H17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 43 45 50 35 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	Read 65 Write 107 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 41.1 51% 68.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 69%
Intenso USB 3.0 device 3TB 287 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 13 13 14 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 32.7 Write 29.2 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 13.3 19% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 91%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB 116 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 396GB free, PID ce23 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 32 Write 27.8 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 11.8 30% 23.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 19%
Seagate Expansion 5TB 118 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 4TB free, PID 231a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 133 130 129 137 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	Read 101 Write 132 Mixed 66.3 SusWrite 131 149% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.8 192% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 58%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB 116 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 1GB free, PID ce23 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 19 Write 27.5 Mixed 26.5 33% 24.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 19%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 507 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2TB free, PID 3312 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 32.7 Write 27 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 12.2 31% 24.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 64%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 890 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2.5TB free, PID 331a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 67 55 58 52 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 100 Write 156 Mixed 107 SusWrite 69.1 150% 108 MB/s	4K Read 7.9 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.8 223% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 51264Y133IHYN 04CB AM2U139C4P2-B01S Kingston 9905471-006.A02LF Kingston 9905474-012.A00LF 14GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.6% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.1 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 16.4 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical V-P8H67E Builds (Compare 141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus V-P8H67E

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $191Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	40x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	25x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	14x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	19x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	11x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	10x

SSD
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	4x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 51%, 10,062 samples	6x
99U5471-012.A00LF 830B M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI 99U5471-012.A00LF 830B M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI 16GBKingstonBench 56%, 9 samples	4x
99U5471-020.A00LF 4x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 947 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $216

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16