ECS A785GM-AD3

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	ECS A785GM-AD3 (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100409
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '20 at 04:53
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 640-$70 18,839 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Memory 67.8 1-Core 47.6 2-Core 95.8 44% 70.4 Pts	4-Core 147 8-Core 167 20% 157 Pts	64-Core 174 11% 174 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% POV(1ACC 751A) 1GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Lighting 18.7 Reflection 15.2 Parallax 16.3 15% 16.7 fps	MRender 21.9 Gravity 17.9 Splatting 15.9 15% 18.6 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 128GB SSD 128GB 8,135 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: H190117H SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 60 83 85 87 83 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.8% Poor	Read 170 Write 153 Mixed 178 SusWrite 75.2 32% 144 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 18.4 4K Mixed 10.5 50% 15.4 MB/s	DQ Read 23.3 DQ Write 47.3 DQ Mixed 27.4 23% 32.7 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 99%
Seagate ST3160813AS 160GB-$139 4,860 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 12GB free Firmware: CC2H SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 61 84 87 88 83 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 97 Write 92.7 Mixed 43 SusWrite 76.3 56% 77.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 65%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 50GB free Firmware: AM0P2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 62 62 62 62 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 74.5 Write 83.3 Mixed 31.5 SusWrite 61.7 46% 62.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-034.A00LF 99U5471-034.A00LF 8GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 667, 200 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.7% Poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 8.2 23% 7.97 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 7.6 18% 6.17 GB/s	Latency 107 38% 107 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A785GM-AD3 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A785GM-AD3

CPU
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 960TAMD $469Bench 54%, 4,461 samples	2x

GPU
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	2x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	2x
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $50Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	2x
AS340 120GBApacerBench 67%, 5,956 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 17,012 samples	1x
9905402-669.A00LF 4x4GBKingstonBench 36%, 23 samples	1x
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 3x4GBMicronBench 42%, 163 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $203

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16