Asus M5A78L-M LE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M LE  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131127
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 19 '20 at 03:02
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4100-$110
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 86
1-Core 73.5
2-Core 139
61% 99.4 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 221
30% 221 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6970
AMD(1002 0B00) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
21% Poor
Lighting 25.1
Reflection 23
Parallax 20.9
20% 23 fps
MRender 23.1
Gravity 26.1
Splatting 30.3
22% 26.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct120bx5 0 120GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 258
Write 215
Mixed 24
36% 166 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 25
4K Mixed 1
59% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 43
DQ Mixed 43.1
40% 64.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 79%
WD WD1001FALS-00U9B0 1TB
151GB free
Firmware: 06.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 69 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 131
Write 128
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 68.8
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
227% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 73%
WD Green 500GB (2012)
464GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 69 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 125
Write 120
Mixed 95.7
SusWrite 68.8
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.9
206% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 79%
Intenso Alu Line 32GB
26GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 9.2 12 7.2 12 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.89% Terrible
Read 20.3
Write 18
Mixed 18.2
SusWrite 10.4
22% 16.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
41% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.89%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
44.1% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 13.2
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M LE Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $140
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback