Acer Aspire XC-705

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-705  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-705
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 20 '20 at 14:59
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 196
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 374
50% 373 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
Sapphire(174B 249A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
9.19% Terrible
Lighting 13.5
Reflection 13.2
Parallax 10.1
11% 12.3 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 0.13
6% 7.93 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.19%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
479GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 43 94 128 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 152
Write 134
Mixed 96.7
SusWrite 80.2
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 109%
PI-300 USB 2.0 Drive 2TB
337GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 35 41 42 41 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.2% Very poor
Read 37.4
Write 38.1
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 39.9
48% 35.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KFG/8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
34.1% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 9.5
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.7
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-705 Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-705

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback