Lenovo 10SFS0Q900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive12.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 10SFS0Q900  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3132
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '20 at 02:00
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$237
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 82.3
1-Core 149
2-Core 298
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 1,131
99% 845 Pts
64-Core 1,123
70% 1,123 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 550X
Device(1642 1865) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.50.32.03
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 30.4
Parallax 21.3
15% 23.4 fps
MRender 29.2
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 33.9
22% 26.3 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phantosys Disk 322GB
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: NO01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 56 52 131 141 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 132
Write 148
Mixed 66.9
SusWrite 102
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
4% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 77%
Kxg6aznv512g TOSHIBA 512GB
427GB free
Firmware: 5107AGLA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1787 812 814 817 815 817 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 1471
Write 792
Mixed 1,045
SusWrite 977
239% 1,071 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 68.8
231% 83.2 MB/s
DQ Read 984
DQ Write 1,268
DQ Mixed 882
734% 1,045 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 240%
Great: 257%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston LV26D4U9S8HJ-8 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (95th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.6% Excellent
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 36.5
MC Mixed 24.9
91% 32 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 25.6
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback