Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 25 '20 at 01:42
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 65.6
1-Core 144
2-Core 283
86% 164 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 913
91% 741 Pts
64-Core 1,362
84% 1,362 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 23
Parallax 18.7
16% 20.5 fps
MRender 28.5
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 26
20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
19GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 475
Write 405
Mixed 301
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 35.5
133% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 134
112% 162 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
0GB free
Firmware: UG2204RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 211
Write 148
Mixed 116
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 9
23% 6.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
509GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 9.6 12 12 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
5.13% Terrible
Read 6.7
Write 10.8
Mixed 8.3
SusWrite 11.2
7% 9.25 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
13% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 5.13%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
1TB free
Firmware: CC4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 48 35 31 30 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 73.7
Write 11.5
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 40.4
32% 43.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
55% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
372GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 131 136 136 134 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 107
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 134
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.2% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 24.4
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 22.4
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,809 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $937
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback