Asus P7P55D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics59.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P7P55D  (all builds)
Memory7.5 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111020
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateApr 09 '17 at 00:33
Run Duration383 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 93.2
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 152
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 369
37% 303 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390X-$340
CLim: 1080 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.4.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Lighting 75.4
Reflection 62.7
Parallax 93
61% 77 fps
MRender 62.7
Gravity 61.8
Splatting 80.1
57% 68.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair CMFSSD-128GBG2D 128GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VBM19C1Q Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 210
Write 86.8
Mixed 78.6
27% 125 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 7.19
4K Mixed 6.55
32% 9.05 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 34%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$49
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 158
Write 155
Mixed 133
111% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.98
4K Write 1.19
4K Mixed 0.38
105% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 114%
ASMT 2115 480GB
76GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 30.1
Write 24.9
Mixed 23.7
33% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.06
4K Write 5.82
4K Mixed 3.95
355% 5.28 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 188%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
26GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
5.54% Terrible
Read 10.9
Write 4.01
Mixed 5.02
7% 6.66 MB/s
4K Read 3.06
4K Write 0.77
4K Mixed 0.67
60% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.54%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.6% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.2
20% 6.93 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D Builds (Compare 1,226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback