PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H67-V (all builds) |
Memory | 8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110308 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Apr 09 '17 at 07:58 |
Run Duration | 284 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
54.8%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 847A) 2GB
CLim: 1248 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.49
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.6%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 65x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 58x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 45x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 29x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 24x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 17x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 23x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 16x |
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $333 |