Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A55M-HD+ R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A55M-HD+ R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 04 '22 at 00:49
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 74.5
1-Core 67.8
2-Core 124
54% 88.8 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 194
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
PowerColor(148C 2390) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1190 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver:
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 17.9
Reflection 27
Parallax 25.3
15% 23.4 fps
MRender 25.6
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 20
18% 21.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$33
112GB free
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 114 119 110 96 120 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.8% Below average
Read 215
Write 193
Mixed 169
SusWrite 124
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 16.2
4K Mixed 14.9
51% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 18.2
DQ Write 19.9
DQ Mixed 17.7
14% 18.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
853GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 142 141 154 163 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 157
Write 152
Mixed 81
SusWrite 148
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1866C10D3/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.3% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 14.4
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 10.8
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A55M-HD+ R2.0 Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A55M-HD+ R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback