Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu ESPRIMO P2560

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO P2560  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3041-A1
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101109
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateSep 29 '20 at 09:33
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300-$38
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
49.9% Average
Memory 75.8
1-Core 35.9
2-Core 71.6
42% 61.1 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 142
19% 142 Pts
64-Core 143
9% 143 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 36F7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.73% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 4.28
4% 4.34 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.13
4% 4.71 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.73%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056RI
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 59 53 59 59 58 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40% Average
Read 220
Write 212
Mixed 144
SusWrite 57.4
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 21
85% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 28.8
DQ Write 56.9
DQ Mixed 27.7
25% 37.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 40%
Great: 89%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
56GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 61 56 60 59 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 66
Write 51.2
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 58.9
41% 55.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 54%
WD WD81PURZ-85LWMY0 8TB
332GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 111 110 110 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 89.2
Write 92.8
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 110
64% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 0.5
213% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.5% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.8
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO P2560 Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P2560

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback