Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3HP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics61.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3HP  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 24 '22 at 08:52
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Memory 56.9
1-Core 58.4
2-Core 107
44% 74.2 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 134
17% 131 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 53%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$244
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.9% Good
Lighting 78.2
Reflection 96.1
Parallax 70.9
64% 81.7 fps
MRender 82.2
Gravity 71.3
Splatting 63.5
58% 72.3 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 78%
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.98% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 96.1
Parallax 9.9
6% 37.8 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7.8
6% 7.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.98%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056R6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 87 90 89 99 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 329
Write 344
Mixed 276
SusWrite 105
59% 264 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 22
73% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 160
138% 204 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TIMETEC-UD3-1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
36.1% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 15.2
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 11.1
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XM-D3HP Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3HP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback