| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Lenovo 1095BN1 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | LENOVO LENOVO |
| Memory | 29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120810 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 07 '20 at 12:28 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | PAK-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2665 0
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
|
67.8%
Good
|
63% 107 Pts
|
54% 449 Pts
|
83% 1,344 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.00
|
17.8%
Very poor
|
18% 20 fps
|
18% 22.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 128 130 130 125 127 MB/s
|
56.6%
Above average
|
48% 217 MB/s
|
87% 29.5 MB/s
|
84% 112 MB/s
|
|
WD Elements 240GB
170GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s
|
19.2%
Very poor
|
23% 31 MB/s
|
994% 5.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B2G70BH0- 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
26.4%
Poor
|
25% 8.6 GB/s
|
21% 7.3 GB/s
|
47% 84.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds