Today's hottest deals

Dell XPS 8900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemDell XPS 8900  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0XJ8C4
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200622
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 07 '20 at 13:16
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$150
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 113
2-Core 205
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 606
60% 490 Pts
64-Core 608
38% 608 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.7% Above average
Lighting 76.2
Reflection 73.3
Parallax 69.5
62% 73 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 71.2
Splatting 55.4
52% 64.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
495GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 384 397 204 23 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 490
Write 400
Mixed 390
SusWrite 235
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 19.2
95% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 33.9
60% 116 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 100%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
149GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 402 404 416 418 417 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 491
Write 407
Mixed 384
SusWrite 408
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 19.7
92% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 29.7
70% 141 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$54
2TB free
Firmware: MX4OABX0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 191 192 192 192 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 179
Mixed 30
SusWrite 191
107% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 111%
Great: 108%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 9.1 9.3 9.2 9.1 9.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 33.3
Write 37.7
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 9.2
22% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.6
186% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 92%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
836GB free
Firmware: 0740
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 9.6 9.7 9.6 9.5 9.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 39
Write 34.7
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 9.6
21% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 14%
Great: 103%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
691GB free
Firmware: 0740
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 9.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 38
Write 39.5
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 9.4
22% 29.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.5
178% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 103%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
845GB free
Firmware: 0740
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 9.5 9.4 9.4 9.8 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 38
Write 34.7
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 9.6
21% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 103%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 44 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 36
Write 36.2
Mixed 30
SusWrite 44.2
27% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.5
171% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 69%
WD My Book Essentials 2TB
47GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.9 5 5.2 5.1 4.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
9.45% Terrible
Read 29.8
Write 21.5
Mixed 20
SusWrite 4.9
24% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.45%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 0762 0762 32GB
2133, 2133, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
67.8% Good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 22.2
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 19.5
58% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8900 Builds (Compare 2,923 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $349
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback