Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190304
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 13 '20 at 17:23
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 113
2-Core 205
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 511
51% 416 Pts
64-Core 609
38% 609 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1386 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Lighting 75.3
Reflection 68.7
Parallax 90.2
61% 78.1 fps
MRender 66.6
Gravity 74.4
Splatting 57.7
53% 66.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1115D0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 725 192 307 1065 534 482 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1,454
Write 254
Mixed 207
SusWrite 551
134% 616 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 23.8
122% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 794
DQ Write 406
DQ Mixed 630
460% 610 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 154%
Great: 248%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
215GB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 35.2
Write 33.1
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 37.9
26% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.5
179% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
655GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 165 167 167 167 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 152
Mixed 105
SusWrite 166
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
246% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 109%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB
14GB free, PID 00c4
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 4.2 4.8 4.8 4.8 3.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
7.03% Terrible
Read 31.1
Write 5
Mixed 12
SusWrite 4.2
14% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.03%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL19-19-19 D4-2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 15.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 13.4
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback