Asus ROG STRIX H370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics81.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX H370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200710
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 16 '20 at 06:24
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User BWA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$131
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 126
2-Core 245
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 636
72% 563 Pts
64-Core 657
41% 657 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$290
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.55
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.7% Excellent
Lighting 98.2
Reflection 107
Parallax 79.6
80% 95 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 99.3
Splatting 84.2
85% 107 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk X600 M.2 2280 SATA 256GB
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6114012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 206 210 210 210 210 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 468
Write 469
Mixed 350
SusWrite 221
84% 377 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 35.3
117% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 283
226% 318 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 97%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100V -63 1TB
616GB free
Firmware: JU0U0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 129 129 130 130 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 149
Write 114
Mixed 54
SusWrite 128
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
200% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 80%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
12GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 12 11 11 10 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 23
Write 21.8
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 12
26% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 2.6
190% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 17%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
1GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 5.3 6.2 6.1 5.8 5.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 12.8
Write 6
Mixed 10
SusWrite 4.9
10% 8.43 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 2.6
176% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CTD M378A5244CB0-CTD Transcend JM2666HLH-4G M378A5244CB0-CTD 16GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 26.9
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 25
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX H370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,446 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX H370-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $441
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback