Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	27.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core Duo T2450 314 User benchmarks, average bench 32% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Memory 50.7 1-Core 12.5 2-Core 20.5 22% 27.9 Pts	4-Core 18.1 8-Core 18.1 2% 18.1 Pts	64-Core 17.3 1% 17.3 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
V-gen09sm20ar128sdk 128G 128GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: S041 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 113 113 83 61 87 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.5% Poor	Read 62.8 Write 58.6 Mixed 102 SusWrite 93.7 18% 79.4 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 28 4K Mixed 14.1 51% 18 MB/s	DQ Read 95 DQ Write 60.7 DQ Mixed 32.7 36% 62.8 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 39%
ADATA HD710 PRO 4TB 569 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 2.5TB free, PID a75a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 23 19 17 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 24.2 Write 22.7 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 20.7 30% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	9.01% Terrible	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 2.6 8% 2.83 GB/s	SC Read 1.4 SC Write 1.8 SC Mixed 1.4 4% 1.53 GB/s	Latency 158 25% 158 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.01% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16