MSI MEG Z390 ACE (MS-7B12)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive388% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B12
MotherboardMSI MEG Z390 ACE (MS-7B12)  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200813
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateOct 20 '20 at 01:53
Run Duration323 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 96.4
1-Core 123
2-Core 290
93% 170 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 1,046
99% 820 Pts
64-Core 1,603
99% 1,603 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 21
Reflection 24.2
Parallax 19.7
17% 21.6 fps
MRender 30
Gravity 21
Splatting 27.3
21% 26.1 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 3TB
2.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2236 2271 2235 2235 2217 2213 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
388% Outstanding
Read 3,232
Write 2,295
Mixed 1,883
SusWrite 2,234
539% 2,411 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 70.5
243% 88 MB/s
DQ Read 1,188
DQ Write 949
DQ Mixed 1,064
798% 1,067 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 388%
Great: 853%
Sandisk S31024G 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: X6104000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 343 345 347 339 347 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 376
Write 341
Mixed 286
SusWrite 345
76% 337 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 46.1
163% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 204
160% 221 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 121%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
910GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2434 2210 1539 1520 1538 1538 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
361% Outstanding
Read 2,519
Write 2,416
Mixed 1,914
SusWrite 1,796
486% 2,161 MB/s
4K Read 66.1
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 94.3
317% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,293
DQ Write 1,036
DQ Mixed 1,178
878% 1,169 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 361%
Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
215GB free
Firmware: CC3E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 84 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 83.2
Write 84.1
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 82.9
56% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 68%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 9TB
6TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 507 503 497 500 501 499 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
302% Outstanding
Read 551
Write 497
Mixed 99.2
SusWrite 501
297% 412 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.9
396% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 302%
Great: 310%
Initio Ini-3910 750GB
82GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 59 59 60 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 61.5
Write 61.4
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 60.3
74% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 40%
Initio Ini-3910 750GB
165GB free, PID 3910
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 70 71 72 71 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 69.8
Write 63.7
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 70.6
80% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3300 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 29.4
100% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 43.5
SC Mixed 30.2
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 52.5
76% 52.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG Z390 ACE (MS-7B12) Builds (Compare 3,172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG Z390 ACE (MS-7B12) - $243

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,349
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback