Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z390 DESIGNARE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190314
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 25 '20 at 13:48
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$385
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 150
2-Core 299
99% 180 Pts
4-Core 598
8-Core 1,185
105% 892 Pts
64-Core 1,652
102% 1,652 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 170
Parallax 179
146% 176 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 155
Splatting 117
122% 154 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 131%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend MTS800 M.2 256GB-$141
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 257 133 43 42 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 415
Write 269
Mixed 255
SusWrite 116
59% 264 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 32.9
113% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 162
145% 218 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 97%
Transcend TS512GSSD230S 512GB
87GB free
Firmware: 2200S8LI
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 469 466 474 471 476 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 460
Mixed 394
SusWrite 471
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 47.3
158% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 272
226% 326 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 114%
Great: 111%
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
44GB free
Firmware: 5.0.7b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 93 91 90 97 82 MB/s
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.7% Good
Read 215
Write 161
Mixed 191
SusWrite 94.2
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 33.3
135% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 120
103% 151 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$91
249GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 108 107 109 108 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
66% Good
Read 124
Write 70.5
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 106
68% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 66%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$60
698GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 92 92 95 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 85.2
Write 98.7
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 92.1
63% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 68%
WD My Passport 2TB
276GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 100 100 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 89
Write 87
Mixed 49
SusWrite 98.8
109% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 44%
JMicron Generic 500GB
60GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 400 403 403 403 406 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 371
Write 372
Mixed 244
SusWrite 403
471% 348 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 24.7
4K Mixed 17
1,481% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 18.4
DQ Write 37.2
DQ Mixed 18.8
1,973% 24.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 222%
Great: 222%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.3% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 23.4
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 24.7
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF Builds (Compare 1,791 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,042
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback