Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '20 at 02:24
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 165
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 330
42% 317 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 420
Gigabyte(1458 368C) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2.33
Reflection 2.69
Parallax 1.91
2% 2.31 fps
MRender 3.14
Gravity 2.17
Splatting 2.39
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
3 512GB SSD 512GB
436GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0311A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 197 199 202 204 203 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.2% Average
Read 220
Write 205
Mixed 192
SusWrite 202
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 18.4
82% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 26.4
DQ Write 84.3
DQ Mixed 23.2
27% 44.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
778GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 142 140 143 143 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 138
Write 134
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 142
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-159.A01LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 18.8
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 61%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LX3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,733 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $522
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback