Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121114
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 03 '20 at 06:39
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 62%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 88
1-Core 52.6
2-Core 127
56% 89.1 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 224
32% 237 Pts
64-Core 299
18% 299 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Lighting 68.8
Reflection 68.2
Parallax 65.7
56% 67.5 fps
MRender 72.6
Gravity 66.3
Splatting 68.3
56% 69.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hyundai 120GB SSD 120GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 153 70 52 71 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42% Average
Read 383
Write 138
Mixed 265
SusWrite 86.7
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 8.9
55% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 78.2
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 17.5
43% 86.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
221GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 84 83 84 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 175
Write 161
Mixed 97
SusWrite 83.7
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 109%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB
59GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 31 31 31 30 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 31
Write 30
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 30.4
41% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 3.3
211% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.2% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 15.2
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 9.4
26% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,894 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback