Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 88% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	72.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	78.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	25.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200401
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 03 '20 at 19:45
Run Duration	268 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$486 50,170 User benchmarks, average bench 89% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	92.6% Outstanding	Memory 75 1-Core 149 2-Core 297 92% 174 Pts	4-Core 590 8-Core 1,112 101% 851 Pts	64-Core 2,701 167% 2,701 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$449 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% HP(103C 2B62) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.8% Very good	Lighting 91.8 Reflection 99 Parallax 96.2 75% 95.7 fps	MRender 83.9 Gravity 87.8 Splatting 81.3 69% 84.3 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 387GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 74 74 70 76 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Read 493 Write 277 Mixed 351 SusWrite 89.1 67% 303 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 78.6 4K Mixed 42.5 144% 50.8 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 198 149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 121%
SSD PLUS 480GB 5,109 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 72GB free Firmware: Z31000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 102 77 121 64 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Read 466 Write 412 Mixed 280 SusWrite 125 72% 321 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 38.7 4K Mixed 27 92% 30.1 MB/s	DQ Read 215 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 152 126% 183 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 108%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB 35,237 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 144GB free Firmware: RVT24B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 472 468 469 438 265 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 442 Mixed 458 SusWrite 428 102% 455 MB/s	4K Read 40.8 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 57.2 189% 66.5 MB/s	DQ Read 305 DQ Write 280 DQ Mixed 289 218% 291 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 126%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 96GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 430 425 427 428 431 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 485 Write 436 Mixed 391 SusWrite 427 98% 435 MB/s	4K Read 41.4 4K Write 82.3 4K Mixed 53.9 175% 59.2 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 199 149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 134%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB 5,792 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1TB free Firmware: 040B SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 114 117 117 117 117 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Read 84 Write 90.5 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 115 57% 78.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.6 182% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 88%
iStorage diskAshur PRO2 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 158% 280GB free, PID 2000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 97 95 97 75 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	185% Outstanding	Read 328 Write 324 Mixed 298 SusWrite 95.3 343% 262 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 36.2 4K Mixed 26.8 2,226% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 25.8 DQ Write 40.3 DQ Mixed 30.3 2,497% 32.1 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 185% Great: 185%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB 3,723 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 4.5TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 158 156 159 158 159 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	75.7% Very good	Read 152 Write 166 Mixed 92.3 SusWrite 158 193% 142 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 1.4 261% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 95%
WD Elements 25A3 12TB 3,390 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 7TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 179 176 170 182 183 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	96% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 186 Mixed 154 SusWrite 178 237% 173 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 9 4K Mixed 1 404% 9.07 MB/s	DQ Read 0.5 DQ Write 4.2 DQ Mixed 1.6 199% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8266.C16FE 4x16GB 167 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	87.3% Excellent	MC Read 35.5 MC Write 29.7 MC Mixed 31.8 92% 32.3 GB/s	SC Read 21.1 SC Write 19.7 SC Mixed 29.2 67% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 90.4 44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 126%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $138Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,347x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $105Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	900x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $150Bench 98%, 89,263 samples	864x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $450Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	594x
RTX 3080Nvidia $700Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	531x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $387Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	418x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $118Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	352x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $120Bench 385%, 327,441 samples	284x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $80Bench 275%, 495,311 samples	269x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	253x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	152x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	146x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $946

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406