Today's hottest deals

MSI X399 SLI PLUS (MS-7B09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 141%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics165% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B09
MotherboardMSI X399 SLI PLUS (MS-7B09)  (all builds)
Memory54.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '22 at 13:17
Run Duration372 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 61.8
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 192
64% 116 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 659
52% 461 Pts
64-Core 2,476
153% 2,476 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Lighting 225
Reflection 221
Parallax 272
183% 240 fps
MRender 276
Gravity 228
Splatting 169
178% 224 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 165%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$70
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,437
Write 2,203
Mixed 1,580
461% 2,073 MB/s
4K Read 58.4
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 77
255% 87.9 MB/s
DQ Read 951
DQ Write 623
DQ Mixed 828
607% 801 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$117
617GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2250 1665 1660 1665 1658 1656 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
332% Outstanding
Read 2,533
Write 2,209
Mixed 1,938
SusWrite 1,759
474% 2,110 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 83.3
271% 92.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,042
DQ Write 714
DQ Mixed 910
670% 888 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 332%
Great: 410%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
207GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 479 477 467 337 288 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 474
Mixed 444
SusWrite 421
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 49
160% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 350
266% 359 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
448GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 479 213 128 112 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 475
Mixed 413
SusWrite 252
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 49.9
164% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 262
225% 331 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 103%
Great: 126%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$91
348GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 112 116 113 113 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 107
Write 68.5
Mixed 79.9
SusWrite 114
68% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 113%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 181 178 175 176 181 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 78% Great: 138%
Seagate ST12000DM0007-2GR116 12TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 158 156 160 160 161 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 62% Great: 102%
SanDisk Ultra 124GB
113GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 7.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 36
Write 18.4
Mixed 23
SusWrite 17.1
30% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2
137% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8266.C16FE 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 60.6
MC Mixed 54.4
143% 50.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 31.8
SC Mixed 23.3
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 126%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 SLI PLUS (MS-7B09) Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X399 SLI PLUS (MS-7B09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $760
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback