Asus A88XM-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus A88XM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '17 at 12:09
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 880K-$105
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 76.7
1-Core 78.8
2-Core 150
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 243
32% 242 Pts
64-Core 242
15% 242 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.7% Below average
Lighting 39.5
Reflection 31
Parallax 37.3
32% 35.9 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 37.8
Splatting 36.3
31% 37.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 471
Write 243
Mixed 168
64% 294 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 8.48
66% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 25.2
DQ Write 83.1
DQ Mixed 26.6
28% 45 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 222
Write 175
Mixed 167
141% 188 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.64
4K Mixed 0.35
143% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 114%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 4GB
3GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
5.53% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 9.93
Mixed 11.7
15% 12 MB/s
4K Read 5.18
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.02
20% 1.74 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.53%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-2133 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
38.8% Below average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 16.1
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 12
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88XM-PLUS Builds (Compare 256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback