Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac18,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple iMac18,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-4B682C642B45593E
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200131
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 13 '20 at 14:05
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7360U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
40.1% Average
Memory 58.8
1-Core 61.9
2-Core 99.8
45% 73.5 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 114
17% 121 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 640 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Apple(106B 017E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.83% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 9.92
Parallax 0.03
0% 3.33 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 0.04
5% 7.48 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 1.83%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple HDD HTS541010A9E632 1TB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA0AB5N0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 49 48 50 47 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 61.9
Write 60.8
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 47.9
37% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
82% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x344154463531323634485A2D3247334232202020 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
65.7% Good
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 41.3
MC Mixed 15.4
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 9.5
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac18,1 Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac18,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback