Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	26.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5700 APU (2012 D.Tr)-$265 6,606 User benchmarks, average bench 48% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	54% Above average	Memory 75.3 1-Core 56.2 2-Core 101 49% 77.6 Pts	4-Core 192 8-Core 188 26% 190 Pts	64-Core 192 12% 192 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D 7,665 User benchmarks, average bench 5% AMD(1002 0123) 768MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1060.0 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	5.62% Terrible	Lighting 7.07 Reflection 7.31 Parallax 6.72 6% 7.03 fps	MRender 4.95 Gravity 6 Splatting 8 5% 6.32 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.62% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Maxtor Z1 SSD 240GB 1,683 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: STKSF010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 143 142 50 108 59 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.8% Poor	Read 159 Write 95.7 Mixed 84.3 SusWrite 107 25% 111 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 23.2 4K Mixed 7.3 44% 15.1 MB/s	DQ Read 25 DQ Write 23.8 DQ Mixed 21.6 17% 23.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 86%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40 13,720 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 76GB free Firmware: 17.01H17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 76 76 76 77 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	Read 104 Write 100 Mixed 63.2 SusWrite 75.8 63% 85.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown R534G1601U1S 8GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.9% Below average	MC Read 16 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 10.9 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 9 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 89.7 45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16