Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics22.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive305% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '20 at 14:08
Run Duration296 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Memory 80.7
1-Core 153
2-Core 306
96% 180 Pts
4-Core 584
8-Core 1,034
98% 809 Pts
64-Core 1,536
95% 1,536 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
EVGA(3842 1573) 1.2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 975 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Lighting 26.5
Reflection 41.4
Parallax 30.3
22% 32.8 fps
MRender 40.1
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 27.7
24% 30 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 882 644 638 620 622 619 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
305% Outstanding
Read 2,599
Write 1,932
Mixed 1,749
SusWrite 671
387% 1,738 MB/s
4K Read 71.5
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 98.1
328% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,374
DQ Write 1,209
DQ Mixed 1,273
960% 1,285 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 305%
Great: 340%
Amd-raid CT250BX10 250GB
223GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 206 152 155 85 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 308
Write 285
Mixed 262
SusWrite 131
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 5.9
18% 5.83 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 75%
Amd-raid Array 4 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 215 173 174 113 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 116
Mixed 111
SusWrite 151
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.6
241% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 101%
Great: 190%
Amd-raid WDC WD40EZRZ-00G 4TB
328GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 157 123 127 91 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 101
Write 109
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 114
69% 94 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 97%
Amd-raid ST12000VN0008-2P 12TB
10.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 233 243 240 243 243 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
131% Outstanding
Read 215
Write 213
Mixed 113
SusWrite 238
143% 195 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.5
790% 6.47 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 131%
Great: 131%
Amd-raid WDC WD20EARS-00J 2TB
304GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 108 106 110 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 79
Write 72.2
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 108
57% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 66%
Amd-raid WDC WD5000AAKX-7 500GB
20GB free
Firmware: 19.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 125 124 128 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 126
Write 113
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 125
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 68%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
168GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 62 69 69 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 102
Write 97.3
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 67.5
59% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 67%
Amd-raid WDC WD40EZRZ-00G 4TB
107GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 88 87 91 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 171
Write 158
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 88.2
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
230% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 97%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$55
516GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 105 111 110 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 147
Write 144
Mixed 90.4
SusWrite 109
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Silicon-Power SP008GXLZU320BSA 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
92% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 37.1
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 38
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 92%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,761 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $936
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $381
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback