HP ZBook x2 G4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP ZBook x2 G4  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 824C
Memory21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 18 '20 at 06:13
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 81%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 203
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 305
40% 299 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M620
HP(103C 824D) 2GB
CLim: 1019 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 452.25
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 11
Reflection 13.2
Parallax 14.3
9% 12.8 fps
MRender 18.9
Gravity 13.8
Splatting 14
13% 15.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXA74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 756 943 1004 995 970 967 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 1,338
Write 961
Mixed 481
SusWrite 939
207% 930 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 30.8
106% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 481
DQ Write 469
DQ Mixed 474
356% 475 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 165%
Great: 306%
Jmicron Corp. 2TB
252GB free
Firmware: 8201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 132 127 121 123 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.3% Below average
Read 248
Write 231
Mixed 209
SusWrite 125
46% 203 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 12
40% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 149
109% 143 MB/s
WD My Passport 25E2 2TB
874GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 81 82 83 82 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 64.3
Write 63.5
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 81.3
84% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 53%
MGTEC Corp. 2TB
267GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 119 116 117 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 102
Write 38
Mixed 50
SusWrite 116
99% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 47%
ASMT 2105 500GB
283GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 61 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 40.5
Write 47.2
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 61
63% 45.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 171%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
79.7% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 26.5
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 31.6
SC Mixed 22.7
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook x2 G4 Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook x2 G4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback