Asus F1A55-M LK R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus F1A55-M LK R2.0  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '20 at 06:45
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3300 APU-$90
FM1 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Memory 66
1-Core 36.5
2-Core 73
39% 58.5 Pts
4-Core 73.8
8-Core 71.2
10% 72.5 Pts
64-Core 74.9
5% 74.9 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6410D
Asus(1043 84C8) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
1.32% Terrible
Lighting 1.57
Reflection 2.04
Parallax 1.41
1% 1.67 fps
MRender 1.67
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 2.17
1% 1.66 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.32%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 74 19 42 81 73 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.2% Below average
Read 218
Write 179
Mixed 142
SusWrite 74.1
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 13
45% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 70.2
DQ Write 62.3
DQ Mixed 1.5
19% 44.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 53%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB
166GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 119 113 119 106 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 117
Write 97
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 114
71% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
100GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 99 103 102 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 108
Write 105
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 102
70% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-022.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 5.1
18% 6.37 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.9
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A55-M LK R2.0 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A55-M LK R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $369
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback