Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	73.8% Very good	Memory 88.4 1-Core 97.3 2-Core 186 73% 124 Pts	4-Core 321 8-Core 470 49% 395 Pts	64-Core 471 29% 471 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300 14,988 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 0354) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.15% Terrible	Lighting 1.53 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 1.28 1% 1.77 fps	MRender 1.38 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1.39 1% 1.16 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.15% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GSSD230S 256GB 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0427BNR SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 234 233 234 233 235 MB/s Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	68.2% Good	Read 256 Write 232 Mixed 235 SusWrite 233 54% 239 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 35 111% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 208 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 175 138% 192 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix DMT351E6EFR8C-H9 2x4GB 124 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.6% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 8.3 25% 8.77 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 9.5 27% 9.5 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,041x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	824x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	425x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16