PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 42.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Asus Z9PA-D8 Series (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK Z9PA-D8 Series |
Memory | 26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20150611 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 25 '20 at 13:21 |
Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
Run User | POL-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
|
37.8%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Asus(1043 8469) 3GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.6%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
222GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 702 580 580 533 592 577 MB/s
|
149%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
597GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 131 129 130 130 129 MB/s
|
71.8%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4C-P 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
50%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples | 18x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v21stBench 74%, 880 samples | 7x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 66%, 741 samples | 7x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 8x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 6x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 96% - Outstanding | Total price: $222 |