Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 185%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 157%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics184% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171019
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 29 '20 at 14:10
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$139
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 94.4
1-Core 151
2-Core 302
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 602
8-Core 851
91% 727 Pts
64-Core 848
52% 848 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 103%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$909
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 4825 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
184% Outstanding
Lighting 265
Reflection 220
Parallax 298
216% 261 fps
MRender 292
Gravity 232
Splatting 174
184% 232 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 184%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 204 234 209 106 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 473
Mixed 387
SusWrite 183
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 47.9
165% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 247
182% 248 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
190GB free
Firmware: 3B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 413 427 453 446 416 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 434
Mixed 440
SusWrite 423
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 51.2
160% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 216
167% 237 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 107%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$84
892GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 140 138 138 137 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 76.7
Write 141
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 138
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 24.7
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 24.5
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 58.7
68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,335 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $644
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback